You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of reproductive healthcare at commune health stations in a changing health system in Vietnam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anh D Ngo, Peter S Hill |
| Abstract |
With health sector reform in Vietnam moving towards greater pluralism, commune health stations (CHSs) have been subject to growing competition from private health services and increasing numbers of patients bypassing CHSs for higher-level health facilities. This study describes the pattern of reproductive health (RH) and family planning (FP) service utilization among women at CHSs and other health facilities, and explores socio-demographic determinants of RH service utilization at the CHS level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2011.
All research outputs
#14,137,641
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,031
of 7,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,241
of 131,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#53
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.