| Title |
Cost analysis of air capture driven by wind energy under different scenarios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40565-015-0150-y |
| Authors |
Yinghui Geng, Canbing Li, Yijia Cao, Hao Chen, Yonghong Kuang, Xuedong Ren, Xinwei Bai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 28% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
#75
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,526
of 268,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.