↓ Skip to main content

Ecological and evolutionary traps

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1648 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological and evolutionary traps
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, October 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02580-6
Authors

Martin A. Schlaepfer, Michael C. Runge, Paul W. Sherman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 36 2%
Brazil 18 1%
France 11 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Other 39 2%
Unknown 1520 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 362 22%
Researcher 335 20%
Student > Master 283 17%
Student > Bachelor 155 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 5%
Other 263 16%
Unknown 175 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 941 57%
Environmental Science 315 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 2%
Social Sciences 23 1%
Other 73 4%
Unknown 240 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 256. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#145,787
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#56
of 3,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 51,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.