↓ Skip to main content

Control of cell–cell forces and collective cell dynamics by the intercellular adhesome

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Cell Biology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
276 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
574 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control of cell–cell forces and collective cell dynamics by the intercellular adhesome
Published in
Nature Cell Biology, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncb3135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsa Bazellières, Vito Conte, Alberto Elosegui-Artola, Xavier Serra-Picamal, María Bintanel-Morcillo, Pere Roca-Cusachs, José J. Muñoz, Marta Sales-Pardo, Roger Guimerà, Xavier Trepat

Abstract

Dynamics of epithelial tissues determine key processes in development, tissue healing and cancer invasion. These processes are critically influenced by cell-cell adhesion forces. However, the identity of the proteins that resist and transmit forces at cell-cell junctions remains unclear, and how these proteins control tissue dynamics is largely unknown. Here we provide a systematic study of the interplay between cell-cell adhesion proteins, intercellular forces and epithelial tissue dynamics. We show that collective cellular responses to selective perturbations of the intercellular adhesome conform to three mechanical phenotypes. These phenotypes are controlled by different molecular modules and characterized by distinct relationships between cellular kinematics and intercellular forces. We show that these forces and their rates can be predicted by the concentrations of cadherins and catenins. Unexpectedly, we identified different mechanical roles for P-cadherin and E-cadherin; whereas P-cadherin predicts levels of intercellular force, E-cadherin predicts the rate at which intercellular force builds up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Spain 6 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
France 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 542 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 161 28%
Researcher 102 18%
Student > Master 64 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 96 17%
Unknown 77 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 123 21%
Engineering 75 13%
Physics and Astronomy 54 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 3%
Other 57 10%
Unknown 102 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,283,626
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Nature Cell Biology
#731
of 4,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,110
of 272,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Cell Biology
#20
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.