Title |
Supporting close-to-community providers through a community health system approach: case examples from Ethiopia and Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12960-015-0006-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Smith Lunsford, Kate Fatta, Kim Ethier Stover, Ram Shrestha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
United States | 6 | 14% |
India | 3 | 7% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 5% |
Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
Kenya | 2 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Uganda | 1 | 2% |
Zambia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 81% |
Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 247 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 54 | 21% |
Researcher | 41 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 13% |
Unknown | 53 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 34 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
Other | 33 | 13% |
Unknown | 65 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,235,313
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#91
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,520
of 278,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.