↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of printed glycan array, suspension array and ELISA in the detection of human anti-glycan antibodies

Overview of attention for article published in Glycoconjugate Journal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of printed glycan array, suspension array and ELISA in the detection of human anti-glycan antibodies
Published in
Glycoconjugate Journal, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10719-011-9349-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatiana Pochechueva, Francis Jacob, Darlene R. Goldstein, Margaret E. Huflejt, Alexander Chinarev, Rosemarie Caduff, Daniel Fink, Neville Hacker, Nicolai V. Bovin, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz

Abstract

Anti-glycan antibodies represent a vast and yet insufficiently investigated subpopulation of naturally occurring and adaptive antibodies in humans. Recently, a variety of glycan-based microarrays emerged, allowing high-throughput profiling of a large repertoire of antibodies. As there are no direct approaches for comparison and evaluation of multi-glycan assays we compared three glycan-based immunoassays, namely printed glycan array (PGA), fluorescent microsphere-based suspension array (SA) and ELISA for their efficacy and selectivity in profiling anti-glycan antibodies in a cohort of 48 patients with and without ovarian cancer. The ABO blood group glycan antigens were selected as well recognized ligands for sensitivity and specificity assessments. As another ligand we selected P(1), a member of the P blood group system recently identified by PGA as a potential ovarian cancer biomarker. All three glyco-immunoassays reflected the known ABO blood groups with high performance. In contrast, anti-P(1) antibody binding profiles displayed much lower concordance. Whilst anti-P(1) antibody levels between benign controls and ovarian cancer patients were significantly discriminated using PGA (p=0.004), we got only similar results using SA (p=0.03) but not for ELISA. Our findings demonstrate that whilst assays were largely positively correlated, each presents unique characteristic features and should be validated by an independent patient cohort rather than another array technique. The variety between methods presumably reflects the differences in glycan presentation and the antigen/antibody ratio, assay conditions and detection technique. This indicates that the glycan-antibody interaction of interest has to guide the assay selection.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Chemistry 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 5 8%