↓ Skip to main content

The impact of family behaviors and communication patterns on chronic illness outcomes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The impact of family behaviors and communication patterns on chronic illness outcomes: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10865-011-9354-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann-Marie Rosland, Michele Heisler, John D. Piette

Abstract

In general, social support from family members affects chronic illness outcomes, but evidence on which specific family behaviors are most important to adult patient outcomes has not been summarized. We systematically reviewed studies examining the effect of specific family member behaviors and communication patterns on adult chronic illness self-management and clinical outcomes. Thirty studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified, representing 22 participant cohorts, and including adults with arthritis, chronic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and/or end stage renal disease. Family emphasis on self-reliance and personal achievement, family cohesion, and attentive responses to symptoms were associated with better patient outcomes. Critical, overprotective, controlling, and distracting family responses to illness management were associated with negative patient outcomes. Study limitations included cross-sectional designs (11 cohorts); however results from longitudinal studies were similar. Findings suggest that future interventions aiming to improve chronic illness outcomes should emphasize increased family use of attentive coping techniques and family support for the patient's autonomous motivation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 409 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 16%
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 9%
Other 87 21%
Unknown 57 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 22%
Psychology 89 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 14%
Social Sciences 52 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 70 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,549,905
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#135
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,038
of 115,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.