Title |
Wildland Recreation and Human Waste: A Review of Problems, Practices, and Concerns
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Management, June 2000
|
DOI | 10.1007/s002670010046 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amy Cilimburg, Christopher Monz, Sharon Kehoe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 19 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,710,488
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#257
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,465
of 39,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them