↓ Skip to main content

The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span
Published in
Memory & Cognition, February 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13421-015-0512-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Oberauer, Timothy Jones, Stephan Lewandowsky

Abstract

The Hebb repetition effect refers to the finding that immediate serial recall is improved over trials for memory lists that are surreptitiously repeated across trials, relative to new lists. We show in four experiments that the Hebb repetition effect is also observed with a complex-span task, in which encoding or retrieval of list items alternates with an unrelated processing task. The interruption of encoding or retrieval by the processing task did not reduce the size of the Hebb effect, demonstrating that incidental long-term learning forms integrated representations of lists, excluding the interleaved processing events. Contrary to the assumption that complex-span performance relies more on long-term memory than standard immediate serial recall (simple span), the Hebb effect was not larger in complex-span than in simple-span performance. The Hebb effect in complex span was also not modulated by the opportunity for refreshing list items, questioning a role of refreshing for the acquisition of the long-term memory representations underlying the effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Professor 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 59%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#19,701,336
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#1,414
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,775
of 259,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.