↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors of long-term survival in geriatric inpatients. Should we change the recommendations for the oldest people?

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic factors of long-term survival in geriatric inpatients. Should we change the recommendations for the oldest people?
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12603-014-0570-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Bień, K. Bień-Barkowska, A. Wojskowicz, A. Kasiukiewicz, Z.B. Wojszel

Abstract

Identification of optimal predictors of the 5.5-year survival in former geriatric inpatients.Investigation of the direction and shape of the relationship between mortality risk and its predictors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 24%
Psychology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,681,963
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,093
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,944
of 279,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.