↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative trait loci for root morphology traits under aluminum stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative trait loci for root morphology traits under aluminum stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00122-009-1051-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hernán D. López-Marín, Idupulapati M. Rao, Matthew W. Blair

Abstract

Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a major limiting factor of crop production in acid soils, which are found mostly in developing countries of the tropics and sub-tropics. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is particularly sensitive to Al toxicity; and development of genotypes with better root growth in Al-toxic soils is a priority. The objectives of the present study were to physiologically assess root architectural traits in a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population of common bean that contrasts for Al resistance (DOR364 x G19833) and to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling root growth under two nutrient solutions, one with 20 microM Al concentration and the other without Al, both at pH 4.5. A total of 24 QTL were found through composite interval mapping analysis, 9 for traits under Al treatment, 8 for traits under control treatment, and 7 for relative traits. Root characteristics expressed under Al treatment were found to be under polygenic control, and some QTL were identified at the same location as QTL for tolerance to low phosphorous stress, thus, suggesting cross-links in genetic control of adaptation of common bean to different abiotic stresses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Pakistan 1 1%
Mozambique 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 72 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 73%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,031,680
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,892
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,564
of 94,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.