| Title |
How to avoid common errors in writing scientific manuscripts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00238-018-1418-z |
| Authors |
Franco A. Maiorana, Horacio F. Mayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 11 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 74% |
| Scientists | 11 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 27% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 36% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,004,156
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#4
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,168
of 344,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them