↓ Skip to main content

Self-Rated Health Among Saudi Adults: Findings from a National Survey, 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Self-Rated Health Among Saudi Adults: Findings from a National Survey, 2013
Published in
Journal of Community Health, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10900-015-0014-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maziar Moradi-Lakeh, Charbel El Bcheraoui, Marwa Tuffaha, Farah Daoud, Mohammad Al Saeedi, Mohammed Basulaiman, Ziad A. Memish, Mohammad A. AlMazroa, Abdullah A. Al Rabeeah, Ali H. Mokdad

Abstract

Self-rated health reflects a person's integrated perception of health, including its biological, psychological, and social dimensions. It is a predictor of morbidity and mortality. To assess the current status of self-rated health and associated factors in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, we analyzed data from the Saudi Health Interview Survey. We conducted a large national survey of adults aged 15 years or older. A total of 10,735 participants completed a standardized health questionnaire. Respondents rated their health with a five-point scale. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, chronic diseases, health-related habits and behaviors, and anthropometric measurements were collected. Associated factors of self-rated health were analyzed using a backward elimination multivariate logistic regression model. More than 77 % of respondents rated their health as excellent/very good. Female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.52, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.88], decades of age (OR 1.35, 95 % CI 1.25-1.46), diagnosed diabetes mellitus (OR 1.54, 95 % CI 1.22-1.93), diagnosed hypercholesterolemia (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.06-1.79), diagnosed hypertension (OR 1.55, 95 % CI 1.22-1.96), number of other diagnosed chronic diseases (OR 1.69, 95 % CI 1.41-2.03), limited vigorous activity (OR 3.59, 95 % CI 2.84-4.53), need for special equipment (OR 2.62, 95 % CI 1.96-3.51), and more than 3 h of daily television/computer screen time (OR 1.59, 95 % CI1.11-2.29) were positively associated with poor/fair health. Smoking, obesity, and physical inactivity were not associated with self-reported health. We found that preventable risk factors are not associated with Saudis' self-rated health. This optimistic perception of health poses a challenge for preventive interventions in the Kingdom and calls for campaigns to educate the public about the harm of unhealthy behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Lecturer 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 29 26%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Psychology 10 9%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#994
of 1,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,231
of 262,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.