↓ Skip to main content

Thyrotropin Versus Age Relation as an Indicator of Historical Iodine Intake

Overview of attention for article published in Thyroid, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thyrotropin Versus Age Relation as an Indicator of Historical Iodine Intake
Published in
Thyroid, April 2015
DOI 10.1089/thy.2014.0574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annenienke C van de Ven, Romana T Netea-Maier, Johannes W Smit, Ron Kusters, Jos W J van der Stappen, Claudia J Pronk-Admiraal, Madelon M Buijs, Christian H H Schoenmakers, Stephan G A Koehorst, Monique J M de Groot, Fred C G J Sweep, Ad R M M Hermus, Martin den Heijer

Abstract

Background In populations with mild iodine deficiency, serum level of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) is negatively and serum free T4 (FT4) is positively associated with age. An ongoing decrease of TSH and increase of FT4 can be found after supplementation of iodine. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are current differences in the relationship between thyroid function and age in relation to differences in iodine intake in the past. Methods Eight medical laboratories in several regions of the Netherlands, which are all iodine sufficient at present, but with a difference in iodine status in the past, provided the results of all TSH and FT4 measurements performed from 2006 until 2011, resulting in 330,802 TSH and 103,940 FT4 measurements. Results The negative association between TSH and age in elderly is only present in areas with a historically iodine deficiency (RC -0.008, 95% CI -0.009;-0.007). In the historical iodine sufficient population, TSH shows no obvious increase or decrease with age. In both the historically iodine sufficient and deficient populations, FT4 levels were positively associated with age in elderly (RC 0.009, 95% CI 0.008;0.010 and RC 0.008, 95% CI 0.007;0.010 respectively). Conclusions There are differences in relationship between thyroid function and age between populations with differences in iodine intake in the past, despite an adequate iodine status at present. This raises the question whether the present but also historical iodine status of a population should be taken into account when establishing the reference limits of TSH and FT4.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Materials Science 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Thyroid
#1,821
of 2,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,244
of 279,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thyroid
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.