↓ Skip to main content

The Gravity of JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)

Overview of attention for article published in Postgraduate Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Gravity of JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)
Published in
Postgraduate Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.3810/pgm.2009.05.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors

James H. O'Keefe, Maia D. Carter, Carl J. Lavie, David S.H. Bell

Abstract

In the recently published Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) study, a large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, rosuvastatin proved to be safe and remarkably effective in the setting of primary prevention. In patients without coronary heart disease or diabetes, with a baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level < 130 mg/dL and a C-reactive protein (CRP) > or = 2mg/L, a statin-induced LDL-C reduction of 50% reduced serious cardiac events by about 50%, including in women and the elderly, and also lowered all-cause mortality. The mean on-treatment LDL-C level (55 mg/dL) in the rosuvastatin arm of JUPITER was about in the mid-range of the physiologically normal levels. C-reactive protein screening should be considered, especially in patients without preexisting indications for statin therapy. In general, the CRP-lowering efficacy of statin therapy is directly and significantly correlated with its LDL-C-lowering activity. Simvastatin, at the 80-mg daily dose, is more toxic to muscles and liver than other statins at their highest dose, and thus should be used with caution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,147,309
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Postgraduate Medicine
#1,195
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,323
of 260,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Postgraduate Medicine
#244
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.