↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 949)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
391 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
554 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10822-015-9840-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pavel V. Klimovich, Michael R. Shirts, David L. Mobley

Abstract

Free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations show considerable promise for applications ranging from drug discovery to prediction of physical properties and structure-function studies. But these calculations are still difficult and tedious to analyze, and best practices for analysis are not well defined or propagated. Essentially, each group analyzing these calculations needs to decide how to conduct the analysis and, usually, develop its own analysis tools. Here, we review and recommend best practices for analysis yielding reliable free energies from molecular simulations. Additionally, we provide a Python tool, alchemical-analysis.py , freely available on GitHub as part of the pymbar package (located at http://github.com/choderalab/pymbar ), that implements the analysis practices reviewed here for several reference simulation packages, which can be adapted to handle data from other packages. Both this review and the tool covers analysis of alchemical calculations generally, including free energy estimates via both thermodynamic integration and free energy perturbation-based estimators. Our Python tool also handles output from multiple types of free energy calculations, including expanded ensemble and Hamiltonian replica exchange, as well as standard fixed ensemble calculations. We also survey a range of statistical and graphical ways of assessing the quality of the data and free energy estimates, and provide prototypes of these in our tool. We hope this tool  and discussion will serve as a foundation for more standardization of and agreement on best practices for analysis of free energy calculations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 536 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 166 30%
Researcher 110 20%
Student > Master 57 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 78 14%
Unknown 83 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 169 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 8%
Physics and Astronomy 43 8%
Engineering 23 4%
Other 85 15%
Unknown 107 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,042,471
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#35
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,724
of 277,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them