↓ Skip to main content

Preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease: two case reports and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease: two case reports and review of the literature
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11255-014-0762-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad R. Toor, Anjali Singla, Jin K. Kim, Xenia Sumin, Maria V. DeVita, Michael F. Michelis

Abstract

A variety of therapeutic modalities are available to alter the abnormalities seen in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). A comprehensive plan can now be developed to slow the progression of CKD. Two clinical cases of delay in the need for renal replacement therapy are described. This delay was achieved by using recognized recommendations for optimal diabetes therapy (HbA1c target 7 %), goals for blood pressure levels, reduction of proteinuria, and the proper use of ACEI/ARB therapies. Recent recommendations include BP <140/90 mmHg for patients <60 years old and <150/90 mmHg for older patients unless they have CKD or diabetes. Limits on dietary sodium and protein intake and body weight reduction will decrease proteinuria. Proper treatment for elevated serum phosphorous and parathyroid hormone levels is now appreciated as well as the benefits of therapy for dyslipidemias and anemia. Concerns regarding unfavorable outcomes with excess ESA therapy have led to hemoglobin goals in the 10-12 g/dL range. Finally, new therapeutic considerations for the treatment of acidosis and hyperuricemia are presented with data available to suggest that increasing serum bicarbonate to >22 mmol/L is beneficial, while serum uric acid therapeutic goals are still uncertain. Also, two as yet insufficiently understood approaches to altering the course of CKD (FGF-23 level reduction and balancing gut microbiota) are noted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%