You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Does B-Value Affect HARDI Reconstruction Using Clinical Diffusion MRI Data?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0120773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sangma Xie, Nianming Zuo, Liqing Shang, Ming Song, Lingzhong Fan, Tianzi Jiang |
| Abstract |
A number of imaging factors can affect the orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction in high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the b-value on the HARDI reconstruction and to seek for the appropriate b-value for ODF reconstruction from clinical HARDI data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 13 | 23% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,734
of 194,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,014
of 263,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,728
of 6,301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.