↓ Skip to main content

Benign Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Craniofacial Complex A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Benign Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Craniofacial Complex A Review
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12105-008-0057-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy Eversole, Lan Su, Samir ElMofty

Abstract

Benign fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial complex are represented by a variety of disease processes that are characterized by pathologic ossifications and calcifications in association with a hypercellular fibroblastic marrow element. The current classification includes neoplasms, developmental dysplastic lesions and inflammatory/reactive processes. The definitive diagnosis can rarely be rendered on the basis of histopathologic features alone; rather, procurement of a final diagnosis is usually dependent upon assessment of microscopic, clinical and imaging features together. Fibrous dysplasia and osteitis deformans constitute two dysplastic lesions in which mutations have been uncovered. Other dysplastic bone diseases of the craniofacial complex include florid osseous dysplasia, focal cemento-osseous dysplasia and periapical cemental dysplasia, all showing a predilection for African descent individuals; although no specific genetic alterations in DNA coding have yet to be uncovered and most studies have been derived from predominant high African descent populations. Ossifying fibromas are neoplastic lesions with four subtypes varying with regard to behavior and propensity for recurrence after surgical excision. The clinicopathologic and molecular features of this unique yet heterogeneous group of diseases are reviewed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 150 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 30 19%
Student > Master 23 15%
Other 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Unspecified 2 1%
Materials Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,265,771
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#874
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,020
of 78,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.