↓ Skip to main content

Positive influence of a natural product as propolis on antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation in senescent rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Positive influence of a natural product as propolis on antioxidant status and lipid peroxidation in senescent rats
Published in
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13105-013-0270-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Lisbona, Javier Díaz-Castro, María J. M. Alférez, Isabel M. Guisado, Rafael Guisado, Inmaculada López-Aliaga

Abstract

Given the importance of oxidative stress associated to aging, it would be interesting to assess the effect of oral supplementation with antioxidant substances capable of diminishing oxidative aggression and free radicals generation associated to this condition. This study investigated the effects of AIN-93 M diet supplemented either with 2 % of propolis, or with 4 % of a natural product obtained from lyophilizate vegetables, selected by its antioxidant properties, in senescent healthy Wistar rats fed ad libitum over 3 months. Propolis supplementation leads to a lower level of glucose and cholesterol concentrations together with a reduction in protein oxidation. Plasma thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance levels were lower in the rats consuming the natural vegetable product and propolis possibly due to its antioxidant components, neutralizing the free radical produced, and thus preventing cellular damage. The results of the present study suggest a synergic effect of overall propolis compounds reducing the oxidative stress and glucose and cholesterol plasma levels associated with aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry
#405
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,023
of 195,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.