You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How are the activity and participation aspects of the ICF used? Examples from studies of people with intellectual disability.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroRehabilitation, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3233/nre-141190 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrik Arvidsson, Mats Granlund, Mikael Thyberg |
| Abstract |
Interdisciplinary differences regarding understanding the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) concepts activity/participation may hinder its unifying purpose. In the ICF model, functioning (and disability) is described as a tripartite concept: 1) Body structures/functions, 2) Activities, and 3) Participation. Activities refer to an individual perspective on disability that does not tally with the basic structure of social models. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,837,286
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from NeuroRehabilitation
#143
of 863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,243
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroRehabilitation
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.