↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium metabolism in health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 1,498)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Magnesium metabolism in health and disease
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11255-009-9548-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos G. Musso

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg) is the main intracellular divalent cation, and under basal conditions the small intestine absorbs 30-50% of its intake. Normal serum Mg ranges between 1.7-2.3 mg/dl (0.75-0.95 mmol/l), at any age. Even though eighty percent of serum Mg is filtered at the glomerulus, only 3% of it is finally excreted in the urine. Altered magnesium balance can be found in diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, nephrolithiasis, osteoporosis, aplastic osteopathy, and heart and vascular disease. Three physiopathologic mechanisms can induce Mg deficiency: reduced intestinal absorption, increased urinary losses, or intracellular shift of this cation. Intravenous or oral Mg repletion is the main treatment, and potassium-sparing diuretics may also induce renal Mg saving. Because the kidney has a very large capacity for Mg excretion, hypermagnesemia usually occurs in the setting of renal insufficiency and excessive Mg intake. Body excretion of Mg can be enhanced by use of saline diuresis, furosemide, or dialysis depending on the clinical situation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 257 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Other 22 8%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 65 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 80 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,202,490
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#18
of 1,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,030
of 109,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them