| Title |
The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-009-9584-8 |
| Authors |
Matthew C. Fitzpatrick, William W. Hargrove |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 505 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 142 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 126 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 15% |
| Professor | 28 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 102 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 293 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 150 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 3% |
| Unknown | 65 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#856
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,106
of 111,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.