Title |
Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C: Attitudes Regarding Future Use
|
---|---|
Published in |
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, February 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10620-011-1604-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul J. Gaglio, Noah Moss, Camille McGaw, John Reinus |
Abstract |
Response to current therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is suboptimal. Direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAA) are expected to improve treatment outcomes. Additional treatments for HCV will invariably make therapeutic choices and patient management more complex. We hypothesize that current perceptions regarding the complexity of DAA therapy will influence attitudes towards future use by practitioners who are currently treating HCV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 25% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2011.
All research outputs
#19,382,126
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#3,362
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,636
of 109,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.