↓ Skip to main content

Generative Programming and Component Engineering

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Generative Programming and Component Engineering'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Object-Oriented Reengineering Patterns — An Overview
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 abc : The AspectBench Compiler for AspectJ
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Certifiable Program Generation
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Generative Programming Approach to Developing DSL Compilers
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Efficient Code Generation for a Domain Specific Language
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 On Domain-Specific Languages Reengineering
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Bossa Nova: Introducing Modularity into the Bossa Domain-Specific Language
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 AOP++: A Generic Aspect-Oriented Programming Framework in C++
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Model Compiler Construction Based on Aspect-Oriented Mechanisms
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 FeatureC++: On the Symbiosis of Feature-Oriented and Aspect-Oriented Programming
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Shadow Programming: Reasoning About Programs Using Lexical Join Point Information
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Generalized Type-Based Disambiguation of Meta Programs with Concrete Object Syntax
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Versatile Kernel for Multi-language AOP
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Semi-inversion of Guarded Equations
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Generative Programming Approach to Interactive Information Retrieval:Insights and Experiences
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Optimizing Marshalling by Run-Time Program Generation
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Applying a Generative Technique for Enhanced Genericity and Maintainability on the J2EE Platform
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Multi-stage Programming with Functors and Monads: Eliminating Abstraction Overhead from Generic Code
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Implicitly Heterogeneous Multi-stage Programming
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Source-Level Optimization of Run-Time Program Generators
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Statically Safe Program Generation with SafeGen
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Type System for Reflective Program Generators
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Sorting Out the Relationships Between Pairs of Iterators, Values, and References
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Preprocessing Eden with Template Haskell
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Generative Programming and Component Engineering
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Component-Oriented Programming with Sharing: Containment is Not Ownership
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Language Requirements for Large-Scale Generic Libraries
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach Based on Superimposed Variants
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Developing Dynamic and Adaptable Applications with CAM/DAOP: A Virtual Office Application
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Metamodeling Made Easy – MetaEdit+ (Tool Demonstration)
Attention for Chapter 11: Shadow Programming: Reasoning About Programs Using Lexical Join Point Information
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Shadow Programming: Reasoning About Programs Using Lexical Join Point Information
Chapter number 11
Book title
Generative Programming and Component Engineering
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/11561347_11
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-029138-1, 978-3-54-031977-1
Authors

Pengcheng Wu, Karl Lieberherr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 11%
Canada 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 89%
Psychology 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,644
of 8,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,888
of 139,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#92
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.