You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance of species occurrence estimators when basic assumptions are not met: a test using field data where true occupancy status is known
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12342 |
| Authors |
David A. W. Miller, Larissa L. Bailey, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Brett T. McClintock, Linda A. Weir, Theodore R. Simons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 6% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,614,239
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,255
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,770
of 278,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#39
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.