You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of trace element addition on process stability during anaerobic co-digestion of OFMSW and slaughterhouse waste
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Waste Management, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Moestedt, E. Nordell, S. Shakeri Yekta, J. Lundgren, M. Martí, C. Sundberg, J. Ejlertsson, B.H. Svensson, A. Björn |
| Abstract |
This study used semi-continuous laboratory scale biogas reactors to simulate the effects of trace-element addition in different combinations, while degrading the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and slaughterhouse waste. The results show that the combined addition of Fe, Co and Ni was superior to the addition of only Fe, Fe and Co or Fe and Ni. However, the addition of only Fe resulted in a more stable process than the combined addition of Fe and Co, perhaps indicating a too efficient acidogenesis and/or homoacetogenesis in relation to a Ni-deprived methanogenic population. The results were observed in terms of higher biogas production (+9%), biogas production rates (+35%) and reduced VFA concentration for combined addition compared to only Fe and Ni. The higher stability was supported by observations of differences in viscosity, intraday VFA- and biogas kinetics as well as by the 16S rRNA gene and 16S rRNA of the methanogens. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 45 | 23% |
| Engineering | 34 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,473,281
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Waste Management
#1,536
of 2,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,449
of 278,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Waste Management
#27
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.