↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of melanomas on nonfacial chronically sun-damaged skin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of melanomas on nonfacial chronically sun-damaged skin
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Jaimes, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Harold Rabinovitz, Ralph P. Braun, Alan Cameron, Cliff Rosendahl, Greg Canning, Jeffrey Keir

Abstract

Melanomas on chronically sun-damaged skin (CSDS) can be difficult to identify and often manifest morphologic features that overlap with benign lesions. We describe and analyze the clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of melanomas on nonfacial CSDS. Melanoma cases on nonfacial CSDS were retrospectively identified from the biopsy specimen logs of 6 melanoma clinics. Clinical and dermoscopic images were combined into 1 database. Demographics, clinical, dermoscopic, and histopathologic information were analyzed. Descriptive frequencies were calculated. One hundred eighty-six cases met the inclusion criteria: 142 melanomas in situ (76%) and 39 invasive (21%; mean thickness, 0.49 mm). Lentigo maligna was the most common histopathologic subtype (n = 76; 40.9%). The most frequent dermoscopic structures were granularity (n = 126; 67.7%) and angulated lines (n = 82; 44%). Vascular structures were more frequent in invasive melanomas (56% vs 12% of in situ melanomas). Most manifested 1 of 3 dermoscopic patterns: patchy peripheral pigmented islands, angulated lines, and tan structureless with granularity pattern. This was a retrospective study, and evaluators were not blinded to the diagnosis. In addition, interobserver concordance and sensitivity and specificity for dermoscopic structures were not evaluated. Outlier lesions manifesting dermoscopic structures, such as granularity, angulated lines, or vessels and any of the 3 described dermoscopic patterns should raise suspicion for melanoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ecuador 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 64%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#7,702
of 10,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,572
of 278,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#63
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.