↓ Skip to main content

Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0873-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Samuelsson, Folke Sjöberg, Göran Karlström, Thomas Nolin, Sten M Walther

Abstract

Preclinical data indicate that estrogen appears to play a beneficial role in the pathophysiology of and recovery from critical illness. Few previous epidemiologic studies, however, have analysed premenopausal women as a separate group when addressing potential gender differences in critical care outcome. Our aim was to see if premenopausal aged women have a better outcome following critical care and to investigate the association between gender and use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources. Based on 127 254 consecutive Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) -scored Swedish Intensive Care Registry ICU admissions from 2008-2012, we determined the risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, accumulated nurse workload score, and length of ICU stay. To investigate association with gender, we used logistic regression and multivariate analyses on the entire cohort as well as on two subgroups stratified by median age for menopause (up to and including 45 years and >45 years), and six selected diagnostic subgroups (sepsis, multiple trauma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia and cardiac arrest). There was no gender difference in risk-adjusted mortality for the cohort as a whole, and there was no gender difference in risk-adjusted mortality in the group ≤45 years-of-age. For the group of patients > 45 years-of-age we found a reduced risk-adjusted mortality in males admitted for cardiac arrest. For the cohort as a whole, and for those admitted with multiple trauma, male gender was associated with a higher nurse workload score and a longer ICU stay. Using information from a large multiple ICU register database we found that premenopausal female gender was not associated with a survival advantage following intensive care in Sweden. When adjusted for age and severity of illness, male patients use more ICU-resources per admission than female patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,168,063
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,981
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,082
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#244
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.