↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009–2012

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009–2012
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10552-015-0567-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arica White, Jacqueline Miller, Janet Royalty, A. Blythe Ryerson, Vicki Benard, William Helsel, William Kammerer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,813,546
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#936
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,814
of 266,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.