↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED: Single cell imprinting on the surface of Ag–ZnO bimetallic nanoparticle modified graphene oxide sheets for targeted detection, removal and photothermal killing of E. Coli

Overview of attention for article published in Biosensors & Bioelectronics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED: Single cell imprinting on the surface of Ag–ZnO bimetallic nanoparticle modified graphene oxide sheets for targeted detection, removal and photothermal killing of E. Coli
Published in
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2015.12.085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ekta Roy, Santanu Patra, Ashutosh Tiwari, Rashmi Madhuri, Prashant K. Sharma

Abstract

A very cost-effective, fast, sensitive and specific imprinted polymer modified electrochemical sensor for the targeted detection, removal and destruction of Escherichia coli bacteria was developed onto the surface of Ag-ZnO bimetallic nanoparticle and graphene oxide nanocomposite. The nanocomposite played a dual role in this work, as a platform for imprinting of bacteria as well as a participated in their laser-light induced photo killing. In terms of sensing, our proposed sensor can detect E. Coli as few as 10CFUmL(-1) and capture 98% of bacterial cells from their very high concentrated solution (10(5)CFUmL(-1)). Similarly to the quantitative detection, we have also investigated the quantitative destruction of E. Coli and found that 16.0cm(2) area of polymer modified glass plate is sufficient enough to kill 10(5)CFUmL(-1) in the small time span of 5 minutes. The obtained results suggest that our proposed sensor have potential to serve as a promising candidate for specific and quantitative detection, removal as well as the destruction of a variety of bacterial pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 8 13%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 29%
Engineering 7 11%
Materials Science 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,758,540
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#839
of 6,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,433
of 399,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#16
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.