↓ Skip to main content

Omega-3 fatty acids and athletics

Overview of attention for article published in Current Sports Medicine Reports, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Omega-3 fatty acids and athletics
Published in
Current Sports Medicine Reports, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11932-007-0037-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artemis P. Simopoulos

Abstract

Human beings evolved consuming a diet that contained about equal amounts of y-6 and y-3 essential fatty acids. Today, in Western diets, the ratio of y-6 to y-3 fatty acids ranges from approximately 10:1 to 20:1 instead of the traditional range of 1:1 to 2:1. Studies indicate that a high intake of y-6 fatty acids shifts the physiologic state to one that is prothrombotic and proaggregatory, characterized by increases in blood viscosity, vasospasm, and vasoconstriction, and decreases in bleeding time. y-3 fatty acids, however, have anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, antiarrhythmic, hypolipidemic, and vasodilatory properties. Excessive radical formation and trauma during high-intensity exercise leads to an inflammatory state that is made worse by the increased amount of y-6 fatty acids in Western diets, although this can be counteracted by eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). For the majority of athletes, especially those at the leisure level, general guidelines should include EPA and DHA of about 1 to 2 g/d at a ratio of EPA:DHA of 2:1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Professor 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 36 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#917,349
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from Current Sports Medicine Reports
#86
of 1,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,411
of 78,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Sports Medicine Reports
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.