↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Digit Ratio (2D:4D) on Mental Rotation Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The Effects of Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Digit Ratio (2D:4D) on Mental Rotation Performance
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9166-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Peters, John T. Manning, Stian Reimers

Abstract

In spite of the reduced level of experimental control, this large scale study brought some clarity into the relation between mental rotation task (MRT) performance and a number of variables where contradictory associations had previously been reported in the literature. Clear sex differences in MRT were observed for a sample of 134,317 men and 120,783 women, with men outperforming women. There were also MRT differences as a function of sexual orientation: heterosexual men performed better than homosexual men and homosexual women performed better than heterosexual women. Although bisexual men performed better than homosexual men but less well than heterosexual men, no significant differences were observed between bisexual and homosexual women. MRT performance in both men and women peaked in the 20-30 year range, and declined significantly and markedly thereafter. Both men and women showed a significant negative correlation between left and right digit finger ratio and MRT scores, such that individuals with smaller digit ratios (relatively longer ring finger than index finger) performed better than individuals with larger digit ratios.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 157 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,422,861
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,553
of 3,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,423
of 78,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.