↓ Skip to main content

Contraception can Lead to Trophic Asynchrony between Birth Pulse and Resources

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contraception can Lead to Trophic Asynchrony between Birth Pulse and Resources
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason I. Ransom, N. Thompson Hobbs, Jason Bruemmer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Environmental Science 3 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,368,979
of 23,493,900 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,422
of 201,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,622
of 285,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,572
of 5,062 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,493,900 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,062 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.