You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What constitutes a ‘native’ species? Insights from the Quaternary faunal record
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.007 |
| Authors |
Jennifer J. Crees, Samuel T. Turvey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 21% |
| Australia | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Ireland | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 57% |
| Scientists | 26 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,145,505
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#997
of 6,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,710
of 282,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#12
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.