You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
鎌倉・鶴岡八幡宮の大銀杏(隠れ銀杏)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo, November 2002
|
| DOI | 10.15080/chitoka.41.0_43 |
| Authors |
柴田 松太郎 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 38% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,600,501
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo
#1
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,174
of 53,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chigakukyoiku and Kagaku-undo
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 49 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them