↓ Skip to main content

Opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia: a focus on gender and age

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opioid analgesic prescribing in Australia: a focus on gender and age
Published in
Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/pds.3767
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha A Hollingworth, Paul D Gray, Wayne D Hall, Jake M Najman

Abstract

The use of prescription opioid analgesics has been increasing over the last few decades in Australia. In particular, oxycodone and fentanyl have increased substantially. We examined the gender and age trends in the prescribing of subsidised opioid analgesics in the Australian population for non-palliative care indications. We analysed the Medicare Australia and Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee databases for prescription data from 2002 to 2009 in 10-year age groups and by gender. Prescriptions were converted to Defined Daily Doses (DDD)/1000/day using Australian Bureau of Statistics population data. Overall use increased progressively in 2002-2009 from 12.95 to 16.08 DDD/1000 population/day (average annual increase 3.4%). Codeine was the most widely used agent followed by tramadol then oxycodone. Dispensed use increased in those aged in their 20s and 30s to plateau between 30 and 59 years for the three most preferred analgesics. The peak use of higher dose formulations of oxycodone was seen in males from 40 years. The highest dose formulation of tramadol was preferred in those aged up to approximately 70 years. Reasons for increased use may include increased prevalence of people with cancer and use for acute pain. The overall benefit and risk in this escalation of opioid use are difficult to determine; however, the increasing risk of tolerance, dependence, overdose and drug diversion suggests to clinicians and policy makers that this escalation may not be in the best interest of all Australians. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
#1,269
of 2,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,000
of 279,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacoepidemiology & Drug Safety
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.