You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inter-rater reliability of STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria amongst physicians in six European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Age & Ageing, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ageing/afp058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Gallagher, Jean-Pierre Baeyens, Eva Topinkova, Pavla Madlova, Antonio Cherubini, Beatrice Gasperini, Alfonso Cruz-Jentoft, Beatriz Montero, Pierre Olivier Lang, Jean-Pierre Michel, Denis O’Mahony |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 30% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#3,563
of 3,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,397
of 102,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.