| Title |
Higher Preoperative Patient Activation Associated With Better Patient‐reported Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-015-4247-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Andrawis, Sina Akhavan, Vanessa Chan, Mandeep Lehil, Dana Pong, Kevin J. Bozic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,196,503
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#576
of 7,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,524
of 278,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#11
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.