You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elephant conservation and corruption beyond the ivory trade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12488 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J. Smith, Duan Biggs, Freya A.V. St. John, Michael ‘t Sas‐Rolfes, Robert Barrington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| South Africa | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,568,120
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#886
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,615
of 282,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#16
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.