You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PLD3 variants in population studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature14038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sven J. van der Lee, Henne Holstege, Tsz Hang Wong, Johanna Jakobsdottir, Joshua C. Bis, Vincent Chouraki, Jeroen G. J. van Rooij, Megan L. Grove, Albert V. Smith, Najaf Amin, Seung-Hoan Choi, Alexa S. Beiser, Melissa E. Garcia, Wilfred F. J. van IJcken, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Eva Louwersheimer, Rutger W. W. Brouwer, Mirjam C. G. N. van den Hout, Edwin Oole, Gudny Eirkisdottir, Daniel Levy, Jerome I. Rotter, Valur Emilsson, Christopher J. O'Donnell, Thor Aspelund, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Lenore J. Launer, Albert Hofman, Eric Boerwinkle, Bruce M. Psaty, Anita L. DeStefano, Philip Scheltens, Sudha Seshadri, John C. van Swieten, Vilmundur Gudnason, Wiesje M. van der Flier, M. Arfan Ikram, Cornelia M. van Duijn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,424,336
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#37,493
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,763
of 281,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#692
of 1,018 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,018 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.