You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can polar bears use terrestrial foods to offset lost ice‐based hunting opportunities?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/140202 |
| Authors |
Karyn D Rode, Charles T Robbins, Lynne Nelson, Steven C Amstrup |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 21% |
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 77% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 71 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 287. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#123,622
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#42
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,281
of 279,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.