↓ Skip to main content

Is the lung floating test a valuable tool or obsolete? A prospective autopsy study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Is the lung floating test a valuable tool or obsolete? A prospective autopsy study
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00414-012-0727-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna-Lena Große Ostendorf, Markus A. Rothschild, Annette M. Müller, Sibylle Banaschak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Other 5 13%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,094,565
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#353
of 2,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,886
of 165,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,097 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.