↓ Skip to main content

Global Access Programs: A Collaborative Approach for Effective Implementation and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 144)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Global Access Programs: A Collaborative Approach for Effective Implementation and Management
Published in
Pharmaceutical Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40290-015-0091-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra Ainge, Suzanne Aitken, Mark Corbett, David De-Keyzer

Abstract

Global access programs (GAPs) provide access to medicinal products for patients with serious medical conditions and no commercially available treatment options. Providing early access to medicines can be challenging for a pharmaceutical company. The demand for a GAP often occurs at a time when other activities are the prime focus, such as delivery of pivotal clinical trials or gaining of marketing authorization. Furthermore, the skills, experience, and infrastructure necessary to implement and manage a successful GAP vary significantly from those required for regular clinical trial execution, and the regulatory environment presents its own challenges, with regulations often poorly defined and with considerable inter-country variation. This article considers the triggers for early access requests and examines the need for companies to develop a global strategy for GAPs in order to respond appropriately to requests for early access. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the processes for GAP set-up, implementation, management, and closure, along with the considerations affecting the type and scope of GAP, such as demand, regulatory feasibility, license status of the product, drug pricing structure, company strategy, costs, and product supply. Also discussed is the need for appropriate personnel to implement and manage the GAP, and when to consider collaboration with an external GAP provider. In summary, GAPs require careful and efficient planning and management, from set-up to closure. Well-run GAPs provide an ethical and regulatory-compliant pathway for access of new treatments to patients with serious conditions and an unmet medical need.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 39%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 17%
Engineering 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,849,242
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Medicine
#43
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,758
of 263,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them