You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Providing Context for the Land‐Sharing and Land‐Sparing Debate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12168 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Law, Kerrie A. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 24% |
| Researcher | 51 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 73 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,026,627
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#687
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,269
of 279,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.