| Title |
Gender difference in snoring and how it changes with age: systematic review and meta-regression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sleep and Breathing, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11325-011-0596-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chung-hong Chan, Billy M. Wong, Jin-ling Tang, Daniel K. Ng |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to study the interactions among age, gender, and snoring across all age groups |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 25% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 41% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,375,151
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#220
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,137
of 130,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.