Title |
Switch to non-toxic shot in the Camargue, France: effect on waterbird contamination and hunter effectiveness
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10344-014-0897-x |
Authors |
J.-Y. Mondain-Monval, Pierre Defos du Rau, M. Guillemain, A. Olivier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,267,098
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#763
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,027
of 351,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.