↓ Skip to main content

Optimizing participation of children with autism spectrum disorder experiencing sensory challenges: A clinical reasoning framework

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimizing participation of children with autism spectrum disorder experiencing sensory challenges: A clinical reasoning framework
Published in
Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, February 2014
DOI 10.1177/0008417413520440
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill K. Ashburner, Sylvia A. Rodger, Jenny M. Ziviani, Elizabeth A. Hinder

Abstract

Remedial sensory interventions currently lack supportive evidence and can be challenging to implement for families and clinicians. It may be timely to shift the focus to optimizing participation of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) through accommodation and self-regulation of their sensory differences. A framework to guide practitioners in selecting strategies is proposed based on clinical reasoning considerations, including (a) research evidence, (b) client- and family-centredness, (c) practice contexts, (d) occupation-centredness, and (e) risks. Information-sharing with families and coaching constitute the basis for intervention. Specific strategies are identified where sensory aversions or seeking behaviours, challenges with modulation of arousal, or sensory-related behaviours interfere with participation. Self-regulatory strategies are advocated. The application of universal design principles to shared environments is also recommended. The implications of this framework for future research, education, and practice are discussed. The clinical utility of the framework now needs to be tested.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 22%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 25%
Psychology 27 16%
Social Sciences 26 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#274
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,334
of 313,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.