You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aversive Reinforcement Improves Visual Discrimination Learning in Free-Flying Honeybees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0015370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aurore Avarguès-Weber, Maria G. de Brito Sanchez, Martin Giurfa, Adrian G. Dyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 27% |
| Researcher | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 46% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,187,135
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,981
of 194,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,162
of 99,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#228
of 885 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 885 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.