| Title |
Individual differences in trait rumination and the neural systems supporting cognitive reappraisal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.3758/cabn.5.2.156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca D. Ray, Kevin N. Ochsner, Jeffrey C. Cooper, Elaine R. Robertson, John D. E. Gabrieli, James J. Gross |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 404 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 24% |
| Researcher | 72 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 79 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 262 | 60% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Unknown | 81 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,432,999
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#63
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,898
of 58,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them